Finance Monthly fake interview

Finance Monthly fabricated an interview with me

By Dan Neidle

February 20, 2026

3 Comments

Earlier this week, Finance Monthly published an article presented as an interview with me. No such interview took place. I was not contacted. I did not answer questions. The claim that Finance Monthly “spoke with” me is false.

The piece reads like generic AI/large-language-model output: heavy use of em dashes, and lots of vague grand-sounding generalisations. The other interviews found⚠️ on the website look similar – I don’t know if the interviews are real (but written up with AI) or entirely fake, like mine.

Finance Monthly was previously best known for issuing fake awards for cash. In 2017, a reporter from RollOnFriday nominated a fake Cypriot water taxi business for a “Finance Monthly Game Changers” award. It won, and was offered a £2,495 “winners’ package”. The following year, RollOnFriday submitted a fake Nigerian firm; it also won after Finance Monthly’s “research department” claimed to have conducted “extensive reviews”.

Finance Monthly now seems to have diversified – as well as fake interviews, it carries promotion for dubious cryptocurrency providers. One of of these appears to be an investment fraud. Supposedly it’s “cloud-based cryptocurrency mining”, but the figures are impossible. Cryptocurrency mining is a low margin commodity business. This doesn’t stop the Finance Monthly article from promising a return of 74% in 38 days, which equates to a 200x return over a year – pure fantasy. The editors of Finance Monthly either didn’t read this or don’t understand the basics of finance and investment.

I emailed Finance Monthly asking why they published a fake interview with me. They did not respond. Shortly before this article was published, the page was removed without explanation.

3 responses to “Finance Monthly fabricated an interview with me”

  1. MK avatar

    Wow, how on earth is this still allowed, not just to your reputation Dan, but for any one who is taken in by these …… (purposely left blank).

    Can you do anything about it?

    1. Dan Neidle avatar

      I’d love to sue them under e.g. GDPR, defamation etc, but it’s probably not worth the hassle. The adverse publicity generated by this article may cost them more than any damages I’d receive.

      1. Barney avatar

        I had a look at their accounts. You’re right: it’s not worth the hassle. Maddening though.

Leave a Reply to Barney Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *